Location Privacy

Subscribe to Location Privacy via RSS

By Ulrich Wuermeling

On January 10, 2017, the European Commission proposed a new ePrivacy Regulation (Proposal). Compared to the internal draft that was leaked in December, the official Proposal has been substantially modified. However, the general approach taken by the European Commission has not changed. The Proposal includes provisions with a broad scope of application covering over-the-top (OTT) services as well as communication between devices and all data stored on a device.

In the internal draft, the European Commission suggested…

By Ulrich Wuermeling

An internal Commission draft of a new ePrivacy Regulation (Draft) has been leaked to the public. The Commission plans to propose it in early 2017, but the content of the Draft does not seem near a final proposal. It is either older or still needs some time to be finalized. The Draft reveals the Commission’s priorities of extending the scope of the Regulation, reducing the number of consent notices for first party cookies, increasing privacy and confidentiality of user data and applying higher fines.

If the approach proposed by the Draft were to pass, the commercial rules for the Internet could change substantially in the EU. The ability of internet service providers to monetize services with marketing would be hampered and the users would have to pick up the bill. The economic impact analysis of the Draft simply ignores these consequences by stating that website publishers would have “small” adoption costs and not mentioning any economic impact for users. Furthermore, the Regulation would in parts isolate the EU market from global innovations by fostering data localization. The approach might shield EU based companies from unwanted competition, but would ultimately slow down the development of the digital market in the EU.

By Serrin Turner

Typically, the process for amending the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is a sleepy affair. Proposed amendments wend their way through a series of judicial committees and, if approved by the Supreme Court, take effect automatically by the end of the year. Theoretically, Congress may choose to intervene and block the change – but it does so rarely. This year, however, a proposed amendment has caught the congressional eye.

Over the past several days, legislators in both the Senate and the House of Representatives have introduced legislation to block a proposed change to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which regulates the issuance of search warrants in federal criminal investigations. Law enforcement already uses Rule 41 routinely to obtain warrants to search computers recovered from physical premises or otherwise taken into law enforcement custody. The proposed amendment addresses a different scenario: when law enforcement has identified a computer being used to perpetrate a crime but cannot determine where it is located. With the proliferation of anonymizing technologies used by hackers and other criminals operating on the Internet, this fact pattern is increasingly common. The rule change under consideration would enable law enforcement to obtain a warrant in such circumstances to search the target computer “remotely” – that is, by hacking into it.

On July 17th, the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act (DRIPA) came into effect in the United Kingdom reinstating the Government’s powers to require communication providers to retain traffic data (also known as metadata) and enabling the Government to serve warrants to intercept communications data on companies outside of the United Kingdom to the extent they were providing services to UK users.  DRIPA became law following emergency “fast-tracked” procedures on the basis that its enactment was essential to ensure continued…

By Larry Cohen and Gail Crawford

While the popular press has been full of stories about the European Court of Justice’s (“ECJ”) ruling creating a “right to be forgotten” (ahead of the still pending Data Protection Regulation), we will focus on both the ruling as well as the specific questions referred to the ECJ that have far-reaching ramifications for global companies such as the test for applicability of national data protection laws. 

First, some background on the facts of the…

By Jennifer Archie

On Friday, Feb. 1, 2013, following the now expected series of public workshops and roundtables and well-timed enforcement actions, the Federal Trade Commission Staff issued a new 36-page staff report, Mobile Privacy Disclosures: Building Trust Through Transparency.  The Report summarizes past actions and guidance, and makes new recommendations for clearly and transparently informing users about mobile data practices in the “rapidly expanding mobile marketplace.” 

The report makes distinct recommendations for meeting fair information practices for mobile…

By Gail Crawford and Amy Taylor

Privacy professionals from more than 20 countries are gathered in Cambridge, England, to discuss privacy challenges in today’s world at the 25th annual Privacy Laws & Business conference.

Professor Michael Birnhack, Professor of Law at Tel Aviv University and Visiting Associate Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London, kicked off the conference on Monday–day one of the three-day event–aptly setting the scene with a session on the…

Focus on Mobile App Transparency

Pursuant to the Obama Administration’s blueprint for consumer privacy released in February (and in accord with a request for comments published in March), the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has issued a notice setting July 12, 2012, as the date for the first meeting in its privacy multistakeholder process. Mobile app transparency will be the focus of the first meeting.

The process “will encourage stakeholders to develop a code of conduct that promotes transparent disclosures…

Spokeo Consent Decree Serves as Important Caution to Buyers and Sellers of Social Media Reports on Consumers to Understand and Comply with FCRA

By Jennifer Archie, Kevin Boyle and Kelsey McPherson

As part of a settlement announced Monday, the FTC sends a reminder that the requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) apply to a service that aggregates data made publicly available on social media sites and then markets the data to businesses for use in hiring decisions. Web…

European Union Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding has confirmed that we can expect to see a draft of the eagerly awaited new Data Privacy Directive in January.

The new rules are likely to significantly strengthen the rights of individuals. According to a press release issued jointly last week by Reding and Germany’s Federal Minister for Consumer Protection, Isle Aigner, “consumers in Europe should see their data strongly protected, regardless of the EU country they live in and regardless of the country in…